lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 3 Jan 2007 11:11:30 -0800
From:	Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	"Shai Fultheim (Shai@...lex86.org)" <shai@...lex86.org>,
	pravin b shelar <pravin.shelar@...softinc.com>,
	"Benzi Galili (Benzi@...leMP.com)" <benzi@...lemp.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc] [patch 1/2] spin_lock_irq: Enable interrupts while spinning -- preperatory patch

On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 12:16:35AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 23:59:23 -0800
> Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org> wrote:
> 
> > The following patches do just that. The first patch is preparatory in nature
> > and the second one changes the  x86_64 implementation of spin_lock_irq.
> > Patch passed overnight runs of kernbench and dbench on 4 way x86_64 smp.
> 
> The end result of this is, I think, that i386 enables irqs while spinning
> in spin_lock_irqsave() but not while spinning in spin_lock_irq().  And
> x86_64 does the opposite.

No, right now we have on mainline (non PREEMPT case);

			i386				x86_64
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
spin_lock_irq		cli when spin			cli when spin
spin_lock_irqsave	spin with intr enabled		spin with intr enabled

The posted patchset changed this to:

			i386				x86_64
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
spin_lock_irq		cli when spin			spin with intr enabled
spin_lock_irqsave	spin with intr enabled		spin with intr enabled

> 
> Odd, isn't it?

Well we just implemented the x86_64 part.  Here goes the i386 part as well for 
spin_lock_irq.

i386: Enable interrupts while spinning for a lock with spin_lock_irq

Signed-off-by: Ravikiran Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>

Index: linux-2.6.20-rc1/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.20-rc1.orig/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h	2006-12-28 17:18:32.142775000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.20-rc1/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h	2007-01-03 10:18:32.243662000 -0800
@@ -82,7 +82,22 @@ static inline void __raw_spin_lock_flags
 	 	  CLI_STI_INPUT_ARGS
 		: "memory" CLI_STI_CLOBBERS);
 }
-# define __raw_spin_lock_irq(lock) __raw_spin_lock(lock)
+
+static inline void __raw_spin_lock_irq(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+	asm volatile("\n1:\t"
+		     LOCK_PREFIX " ; decb %0\n\t"
+		     "jns 3f\n"
+		     STI_STRING "\n"
+		     "2:\t"
+		     "rep;nop\n\t"
+		     "cmpb $0,%0\n\t"
+		     "jle 2b\n\t"
+		     CLI_STRING "\n"
+		     "jmp 1b\n"
+		     "3:\n\t"
+		     : "+m" (lock->slock) : : "memory");
+}
 #endif
 
 static inline int __raw_spin_trylock(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ