linux-kernel - Re: kernel + gcc 4.1 = several problems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 3 Jan 2007 12:24:56 -0800 (PST)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
To:	Tim Schmielau <tim@...sik3.uni-rostock.de>
cc:	l.genoni@...relinux.com, Grzegorz Kulewski <kangur@...com.net>,
	Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>, s0348365@....ed.ac.uk,
	76306.1226@...puserve.com, akpm@...l.org, bunk@...sta.de,
	greg@...ah.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: kernel + gcc 4.1 = several problems

On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Tim Schmielau wrote:
>
> Well, on a P4 (which is supposed to be soo bad) I get:

Interesting. My P4 gets basically exactly the same timings for the cmov 
and branch cases.  And my Core 2 is consistently faster (something like 
15%) for the branch version.

Btw, the test-case should be the best possible one for cmov, since there 
are no data-dependencies except for ALU operations, and everything is 
totally independent (the actual values have no data dependencies at all, 
since they are constants). So the critical path issue never show up.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/