[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070103223024.GA5078@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 23:30:24 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@...ax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Cc: Frank van Maarseveen <frankvm@...nkvm.com>,
Jan Harkes <jaharkes@...cmu.edu>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Finding hardlinks
Hi!
> >Sure it is. Numerous popular POSIX filesystems do that. There is a lot of
> >inode number space in 64 bit (of course it is a matter of time for it to
> >jump to 128 bit and more)
>
> If the filesystem was designed by someone not from Unix world (FAT, SMB,
> ...), then not. And users still want to access these filesystems.
>
> 64-bit inode numbers space is not yet implemented on Linux --- the problem
> is that if you return ino >= 2^32, programs compiled without
> -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 will fail with stat() returning -EOVERFLOW --- this
> failure is specified in POSIX, but not very useful.
Hehe, can we simply -EOVERFLOW on VFAT all the time? ...probably not
useful :-(. But ability to say "unknown" in st_ino field would
help....
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists