[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <001001c72eda$f892b1a0$ff0da8c0@amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 18:00:40 -0800
From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@...el.com>
To: "'Zach Brown'" <zach.brown@...cle.com>
Cc: "'Andrew Morton'" <akpm@...l.org>, <linux-aio@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"'Benjamin LaHaise'" <bcrl@...ck.org>, <suparna@...ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [patch] aio: streamline read events after woken up
Zach Brown wrote on Tuesday, January 02, 2007 5:06 PM
> To: Chen, Kenneth W
> > Given the previous patch "aio: add per task aio wait event condition"
> > that we properly wake up event waiting process knowing that we have
> > enough events to reap, it's just plain waste of time to insert itself
> > into a wait queue, and then immediately remove itself from the wait
> > queue for *every* event reap iteration.
>
> Hmm, I dunno. It seems like we're still left with a pretty silly loop.
>
> Would it be reasonable to have a loop that copied multiple events at
> a time? We could use some __copy_to_user_inatomic(), it didn't exist
> when this stuff was first written.
It sounds reasonable, but I think it will be complicated because of
kmap_atomic on the ring buffer, along with tail wraps around ring
buffer index there. By then, most of you would probably veto the
patch anyway ;-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists