| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200701022241.05303.lenb@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 22:41:05 -0500 From: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> To: Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: ACPI: EC: evaluating _Q10 > > The bigger question is why you get "tons of these" -- > > as EC events are usually infrequent. > > Do you have a big number next to "acpi" in /proc/interrupts? > > If so, at what rate is it growing? > > maybe tons were a bit to overstated... After a fresh reboot, i count 110 > _q10 and one _q21messages now with 8 min. uptime and around 10300 acpi > interrupts. 480 sec/110 ec events = 4 seconds/event. This doesn't worry me. Could be battery updates, thermal updates etc. 480/10300 = an interrupt every 46 ms. This is certainly not right. Have you always seen runaway acpi interrupts on this box, no matter the kernel? thanks, -Len - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists