[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070102.205721.98552646.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 20:57:21 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dan@...ian.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Contents of core dumps
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@...ian.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 21:02:28 -0500
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 10:18:07PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> > How about something like the following patch? If it's executable
> > and not written to, skip it. This would skip the main executable
> > image and all text segments of the shared libraries mapped in.
>
> I've been going through GDB test failures (... again...) and I'm down
> to a respectably small number on x86_64, but this is one of the
> remaining ones. I don't suppose there's been any change since we
> discussed this in April?
Not to my knowledge.
> Does Linux need knobs for this?
I don't think so.
The current behavior is very non-intuitive.
As a person who hacks gdb, the kernel, and the interactions between
them extensively, it took even me quite a while to track down this
problem.
Imagine some less skilled person trying to analyze a core dump
expecting the necessary information to be there and being unable
to figure out why?
So I'd say we should just put this change in, as-is. It fixes bugs,
and in all the time that has passed since my initial posting there
has not been any serious dissent.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists