linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ppc: vio of_node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <fe1ade034ed253be4ed738a9a91d5718@kernel.crashing.org>
Date:	Wed, 3 Jan 2007 01:24:04 +0100
From:	Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@...land.pl>
Cc:	paulus@...ba.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppc: vio of_node_put cleanup

>> The comment used to be inside the "if" block, is this
>> change correct?
>
> You'd prefer an empty line in there?

Obviously, you should change the comment to include the
conditional, if that is what is needed.

>> [And, do we want all these changes anyway?  I don't care
>> either way, both sides have their pros and their cons --
>> just asking :-) ]
>
> You know my opinion already :-)

Heh.  Ok, I'll rephrase: is there _consensus_ that this is a
good thing :-)  [But never mind, I looked it up, and it is
*documented* as being supported, so fine with me].


Segher

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/