[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9D2C22909C6E774EBFB8B5583AE5291C01A4FB27@fmsmsx414.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 15:59:28 -0800
From: "Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
To: "Bill Huey \(hui\)" <billh@...ppy.monkey.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Daniel Walker" <dwalker@...sta.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] lock stat for -rt 2.6.20-rc2-rt2.2.lock_stat.patch
Bill Huey (hui) wrote:
>
> Patch here:
>
>
http://mmlinux.sourceforge.net/public/patch-2.6.20-rc2-rt2.2.lock_stat.p
atch
>
> bill
This version is much better and ran stablely.
If I'm reading the output correctly, the locks are listed by
their initialization point (function, file and line # that a lock is
initialized).
That's good information to identify the lock.
However, it will be more useful if there is information about where the
locking
was initiated from and who was trying to obtain the lock.
Tim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists