[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9D2C22909C6E774EBFB8B5583AE5291C01A4FBE5@fmsmsx414.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 17:11:04 -0800
From: "Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
To: "Bill Huey \(hui\)" <billh@...ppy.monkey.org>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Daniel Walker" <dwalker@...sta.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] lock stat for -rt 2.6.20-rc2-rt2.2.lock_stat.patch
Bill Huey (hui) wrote:
>
> Thanks, the numbers look a bit weird in that the first column should
> have a bigger number of events than that second column since it is a
> special case subset. Looking at the lock_stat_note() code should show
> that to be the case. Did you make a change to the output ?
No, I did not change the output. I did reset to the contention content
by doing echo "0" > /proc/lock_stat/contention.
I noticed that the first column get reset but not the second column. So
the reset code probably need to be checked.
Tim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists