[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9D2C22909C6E774EBFB8B5583AE5291C01A4FC37@fmsmsx414.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 18:14:11 -0800
From: "Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
To: "Bill Huey \(hui\)" <billh@...ppy.monkey.org>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Daniel Walker" <dwalker@...sta.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] lock stat for -rt 2.6.20-rc2-rt2.2.lock_stat.patch
Bill Huey (hui) wrote:
> This should have the fix.
>
>
http://mmlinux.sf.net/public/patch-2.6.20-rc2-rt2.3.lock_stat.patch
>
> If you can rerun it and post the results, it'll hopefully show the
> behavior of that lock acquisition better.
>
Here's the run with fix to produce correct statistics.
Tim
@contention events = 848858
@failure_events = 10
@lookup_failed_scope = 175
@lookup_failed_static = 47
@static_found = 17
[2, 0, 0 -- 1, 0] {journal_init_common, fs/jbd/journal.c,
667}
[2, 0, 0 -- 31, 0] {blk_init_queue_node, block/ll_rw_blk.c,
1910}
[2, 0, 0 -- 31, 0] {create_workqueue_thread,
kernel/workqueue.c, 474}
[3, 3, 2 -- 16384, 0] {tcp_init, net/ipv4/tcp.c, 2426}
[4, 4, 1 -- 1, 0] {lock_kernel, -, 0}
[19, 0, 0 -- 1, 0] {kmem_cache_alloc, -, 0}
[25, 0, 0 -- 1, 0] {kfree, -, 0}
[49, 0, 0 -- 2, 0] {kmem_cache_free, -, 0}
[69, 38, 176 -- 1, 0] {lock_timer_base, -, 0}
[211, 117, 517 -- 3, 0] {init_timers_cpu, kernel/timer.c, 1842}
[1540, 778, 365 -- 7326, 0] {sock_lock_init,
net/core/sock.c, 817}
[112584, 150, 6 -- 256, 0] {init, kernel/futex.c, 2781}
[597012, 183895, 136277 -- 9546, 0] {mm_init, kernel/fork.c,
369}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists