[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <459D55E3.4000905@drzeus.cx>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 20:30:43 +0100
From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx>
To: Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@...cvut.cz>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NCPFS and brittle connections
Petr Vandrovec wrote:
>
> Nobody is working on it (at least to my knowledge), and to me it is
> feature - it always worked this way, like smbfs did back in the past -
> if you send signal 9 to process using mount point, and there is some
> transaction in progress, nobody can correctly finish that transaction
> anymore. Fixing it would require non-trivial amount of code, and
> given that NCP itself is more or less dead protocol I do not feel that
> it is necessary.
>
Someone needs to tell our customers then so they'll stop using it. :)
> If you want to fix it, feel free. Culprit is RQ_INPROGRESS handling
> in ncp_abort_request - it just aborts whole connection so it does not
> have to provide temporary buffers and special handling for reply - as
> buffers currently specified as reply buffers are owned by caller, so
> after aborting request you cannot use them anymore.
Do you have any pointers to how it was solved with smbfs? Relevant
patches perhaps? Provided a similar solution can be applied here.
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org
PulseAudio, core developer http://pulseaudio.org
rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists