[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070104131008.1d95cb0c.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 13:10:08 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [UPDATED PATCH] fix memory corruption from misinterpreted
bad_inode_ops return values
On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 15:04:17 -0600
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 20:24:12 +0000
> > Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> So my main issue with fs/bad_inode.c is not even cast per se; it's that
> >> cast is to void *.
> >
> > But Eric's latest patch is OK in that regard, isn't it? It might confuse
> > parsers (in fixable ways), but it is type-correct and has no casts. (Well,
> > it kinda has an link-time cast).
>
> Even if it is, I'm starting to wonder if all this tricksiness is really
> worth it for 400 bytes or so. :)
>
Ah, but it's a learning opportunity!
btw, couldn't we fix this bug with a simple old
--- a/fs/bad_inode.c~a
+++ a/fs/bad_inode.c
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
#include <linux/smp_lock.h>
#include <linux/namei.h>
-static int return_EIO(void)
+static long return_EIO(void)
{
return -EIO;
}
_
?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists