[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070104232106.GK35756@gaz.sfgoth.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 15:21:06 -0800
From: Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@...oth.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [UPDATED PATCH] fix memory corruption from misinterpreted bad_inode_ops return values
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Well, that probably would work, but it's also true that returning a 64-bit
> value on a 32-bit platform really _does_ depend on more than the size.
Yeah, obviously this is restricted to the signed-integer case. My point
was just that you could have the compiler figure out which variant to pick
for loff_t automatically.
> "let's not play tricks with function types at all".
I think I agree. The real (but harder) fix for the wasted space issue
would be to get the toolchain to automatically combine functions that
end up compiling into identical assembly.
-Mitch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists