[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <459C8427.9040704@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 15:35:51 +1100
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...l.org,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@...cle.com>,
"Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 4/4 block: explicit plugging
Jens Axboe wrote:
> Nick writes:
>
> This is a patch to perform block device plugging explicitly in the submitting
> process context rather than implicitly by the block device.
Hi Jens,
Hey thanks for doing so much hard work with this, I couldn't have fixed
all the block layer stuff myself. QRCU looks like a good solution for the
barrier/sync operations (/me worried that one wouldn't exist), and a
novel use of RCU!
The only thing I had been thinking about before it is ready for primetime
-- as far as the VM side of things goes -- is whether we should change
the hard calls to address_space operations, such that they might be
avoided or customised when there is no backing block device?
I'm sure the answer to this is "yes", so I have an idea for a simple
implementation... but I'd like to hear thoughts from network fs / raid
people?
Nick
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists