[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <459C8833.7080500@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 15:53:07 +1100
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
CC: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled find_trylock_page() removal
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch contains the scheduled find_trylock_page() removal.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
I guess I don't have a problem with this going into -mm and making its way
upstream sometime after the next release.
I would normally say it is OK to stay for another year because it is so
unintrusive, but I don't like the fact it doesn't give one an explicit ref
on the page -- it could be misused slightly more easily than find_lock_page
or find_get_page.
Anyone object? Otherwise:
Acked-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists