linux-kernel - Re: Multi kernel tree support on the same distro?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <459E7861.9070803@foo-projects.org>
Date:	Fri, 05 Jan 2007 08:10:09 -0800
From:	Auke Kok <sofar@...-projects.org>
To:	"Renato S. Yamane" <renatoyamane@...dic.com.br>
CC:	Akula2 <akula2.shark@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Multi kernel tree support on the same distro?

Renato S. Yamane wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Em 05-01-2007 10:04, Akula2 escreveu:
>> On 1/5/07, Auke Kok <sofar@...-projects.org> wrote:
>>> Steve Brueggeman wrote:
>>> gcc 3.4.x works great on both 2.6 and 2.4, no issues whatsoever.
>> Do you mean I need to discard gcc 4.1.x on the distro? Or keep both?
> 
> I use GCC 4.1.2 with vendor Kernel (OpenSuSE) 2.6.18.2 with no problem.
> In next weekend I will compile a new Kernel. 2.6.19.1

I was not saying that *other* compilers don't work, but merely stating that a certain 
version of gcc does really well with BOTH (and most) 2.4 and 2.6 kernel sources. I doubt 
that gcc-4.1.x works all that great with some of the not-so-recent 2.4 kernels.

Auke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/