lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 08:10:09 -0800 From: Auke Kok <sofar@...-projects.org> To: "Renato S. Yamane" <renatoyamane@...dic.com.br> CC: Akula2 <akula2.shark@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Multi kernel tree support on the same distro? Renato S. Yamane wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Em 05-01-2007 10:04, Akula2 escreveu: >> On 1/5/07, Auke Kok <sofar@...-projects.org> wrote: >>> Steve Brueggeman wrote: >>> gcc 3.4.x works great on both 2.6 and 2.4, no issues whatsoever. >> Do you mean I need to discard gcc 4.1.x on the distro? Or keep both? > > I use GCC 4.1.2 with vendor Kernel (OpenSuSE) 2.6.18.2 with no problem. > In next weekend I will compile a new Kernel. 2.6.19.1 I was not saying that *other* compilers don't work, but merely stating that a certain version of gcc does really well with BOTH (and most) 2.4 and 2.6 kernel sources. I doubt that gcc-4.1.x works all that great with some of the not-so-recent 2.4 kernels. Auke - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists