lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 06 Jan 2007 20:55:01 +0100
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	Tim Schmielau <tim@...sik3.uni-rostock.de>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc3 regression?  hdparm shows 1/2...1/3 the throughput

Tim Schmielau wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Stefan Richter wrote:
> 
>> Did anybody else notice this?  The result of "hdparm -t" under 2.6.20-rc
>> seems to be less than half of what you get on 2.6.19.  However, disk I/O
>> did *not* get slower according to bonnie++.
> 
> yes. See
>   http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/2/75
> for the solution.
> 
> Tim

Thanks. I should have remembered that.

# hdparm -tT /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
 Timing cached reads:   10864 MB in  2.00 seconds = 5440.10 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:   58 MB in  3.06 seconds =  18.94 MB/sec
# cat /sys/block/hda/queue/scheduler
noop anticipatory deadline [cfq]
# echo anticipatory > /sys/block/hda/queue/scheduler
# hdparm -tT /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
 Timing cached reads:   10680 MB in  2.00 seconds = 5347.20 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  148 MB in  3.02 seconds =  49.03 MB/sec

-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== ---= --==-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ