linux-kernel - Re: revert PIE randomization?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070106214505.GA8904@elte.hu>
Date:	Sat, 6 Jan 2007 22:45:05 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Marcus Meissner <meissner@...e.de>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: revert PIE randomization?


* Marcus Meissner <meissner@...e.de> wrote:

> > You're right. I'm inclined to just revert it, modulo some comments 
> > from others. Marcus?
> 
> After thinking about this, yes.
> 
> I would rather have a working range used here (perhaps like Hugh 
> suggested), but feel free to revert the original patch if you are not 
> confident with it.

i'm wondering why you had to try to reinvent the wheel, instead of 
picking up exec-shield's remaining bits of randomization implementation 
from Fedora, which was tested for a long time and achieves PIE 
randomization and more?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/