linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] MMC: new version of the TI Flash Media card reader driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b637ec0b0701070656g5e276ae4ie39eb45d002260c@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 7 Jan 2007 09:56:36 -0500
From:	"Fabio Comolli" <fabio.comolli@...il.com>
To:	"Pierre Ossman" <drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx>,
	"Alex Dubov" <oakad@...oo.com>
Cc:	"kernel list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] MMC: new version of the TI Flash Media card reader driver

Hi.
I just wanted to let you know that I tested the version found in
git-mmc.patch (from latest -mm kernel) with kernel version
2.6.20-rc3-g6a4306b3 (2 or 3 days ago Linus' GIT tree).

No problems so far: the driver seems pretty stable: it survived
various suspend-to-ram and suspend-to-disk attempts without a single
problem, even with the card inserted and filesystem mounted.

Tests were performed with a 2GB SD card, a 512MB MMC card and with a
256 mini-SD.

Best regards,
Fabio





On 11/22/06, Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx> wrote:
> Alex Dubov wrote:
> > I know that the patch is too big, but I have no way to split it up. Basically, I've changed so
> > many things (I had quite a few problems with interrupts after suspend/resume) that it can be
> > regarded as a brand new driver. My SVN became somewhat messy too.
> >
> > I can post the driver in it full (non-diff) form or as a 4 per-file diffs, but I have no way to
> > split it up into per-issue form (except for issues 3 and 5, which are one-liners).
> >
>
> That's a start. But 4 sounds like it could be broken out with some work.
>
> I'm not saying it's trivial to break this apart, but it is something
> that needs to be done. At the very least the commit messages need to
> reflect what is changed and why.
>
> See it as practice as this is an issue you will be hit by now and then
> as a kernel developer. :)
>
> Rgds
> --
>      -- Pierre Ossman
>
>   Linux kernel, MMC maintainer        http://www.kernel.org
>   PulseAudio, core developer          http://pulseaudio.org
>   rdesktop, core developer          http://www.rdesktop.org
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/