linux-kernel - Re: [announce] [patch] KVM paravirtualization for Linux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070107182946.GA8158@infradead.org>
Date:	Sun, 7 Jan 2007 18:29:46 +0000
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	kvm-devel <kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
Subject: Re: [announce] [patch] KVM paravirtualization for Linux

On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 01:08:18PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Does this make Xen obsolete? I mean... we have xen patches in suse
> kernels, should we keep updating them, or just drop them in favour of
> KVM?

After all the Novell Marketing Hype you'll probably have to keep Xen ;-)
Except for that I suspect a paravirt kvm or lhype might be the better
hypervisor choice in the long term.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/