[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070107025425.0A7C21FAC07@adsl-69-226-248-13.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 18:54:24 -0800
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: hugh@...itas.com
Cc: phdm@...qel.be, mpm@...enic.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RTC subsystem and fractions of seconds
> > Hmm ... "looping" fights against "quickly"; as would "wait for next
> > update IRQ" (on RTCs that support that). But it would improve precision,
> > at least in the sense of having the system clock and that RTC spending
> > less time with the lowest "seconds" digit disagreeing.
> >
> > This is something you could write a patch for, n'est-ce pas?
>
> If you're thinking of going that way,
Philippe seemed to be ...
> it'd be courteous to CC Matt,
> who devoted some effort to removing just that loop in 2.6.17 ;)
Hmm ... "git whatchanged drivers/rtc/hctosys.c" shows no such change.
So I can't find any record of such a change or its rationale.
- dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists