[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45A07587.3080503@garzik.org>
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 23:22:31 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: nigel@...el.suspend2.net, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
CC: "J.H." <warthog9@...nel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
webmaster@...nel.org, Git Mailing List <git@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [KORG] Re: kernel.org lies about latest -mm kernel
> On Tue, 2006-12-26 at 08:49 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Not really. In fact, it would hardly help at all.
>>
>> The two things git users can do to help is:
>>
>> 1. Make sure your alternatives file is set up correctly;
>> 2. Keep your trees packed and pruned, to keep the file count down.
>>
>> If you do this, the load imposed by a single git tree is fairly negible.
Would kernel hackers be amenable to having their trees auto-repacked,
and linked via alternatives to Linus's linux-2.6.git?
Looking through kernel.org, we have a ton of repositories, however
packed, that carrying their own copies of the linux-2.6.git repo.
Also, I wonder if "git push" will push only the non-linux-2.6.git
objects, if both local and remote sides have the proper alternatives set up?
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists