linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.16.37

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200701070337_MC3-1-D79B-2928@compuserve.com>
Date:	Sun, 7 Jan 2007 03:35:21 -0500
From:	Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@...puserve.com>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.16.37

In-Reply-To: <20070104222517.GL20714@...sta.de>

On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 23:25:17 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> There's already a CVE number for
> "i386: save/restore eflags in context switch".
> 
> Are there also CVE numbers for the equivalent x86_64 patch and
> "x86_64: fix ia32 syscall count"?

Sorry, my Web access is broken for now so I can't check, but I believe
that CVE number is for a different, older problem.

So AFAIK there are no CVE numbers for anything I sent (but there
probably should be.)  Generic Linux kernel developers don't have
a CVE representative, so we depend on vendors to assign numbers
and sometimes they don't.

-- 
"That's the problem with non-representational art:
 you can't tell which part offends you."
     --Stephen Colbert
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/