linux-kernel - Re: [patch] paravirt: isolate module ops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1168148159.20372.49.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Sun, 07 Jan 2007 16:35:59 +1100
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...source.com>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, airlied@...ux.ie
Subject: Re: [patch] paravirt: isolate module ops

On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 19:31 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 03:18:45AM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > PS.  drm_memory.h has a "drm_follow_page": this forces us to uninline
> > various page tables ops.  Can this use follow_page() somehow, or do we
> > need an "__follow_page" export for this case?
> 
> Not if avoidable.  And it seems avoidable as drm really should be using
> vmalloc_to_page.  Untested patch below:

Thanks Christoph, that patch looks great to me!  I didn't know about
vmalloc_to_page...

Want to produce a signed-off version?

Thanks,
Rusty.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/