[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070108112713.GA25857@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:27:14 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: mikulas@...ax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, matthew@....cx,
bhalevy@...asas.com, arjan@...radead.org, jaharkes@...cmu.edu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
nfsv4@...f.org
Subject: Re: Finding hardlinks
On Fri 2007-01-05 16:15:41, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > And does it matter? If you rename a file, tar might skip it no matter of
> > > hardlink detection (if readdir races with rename, you can read none of the
> > > names of file, one or both --- all these are possible).
> > >
> > > If you have "dir1/a" hardlinked to "dir1/b" and while tar runs you delete
> > > both "a" and "b" and create totally new files "dir2/c" linked to "dir2/d",
> > > tar might hardlink both "c" and "d" to "a" and "b".
> > >
> > > No one guarantees you sane result of tar or cp -a while changing the tree.
> > > I don't see how is_samefile() could make it worse.
> >
> > There are several cases where changing the tree doesn't affect the
> > correctness of the tar or cp -a result. In some of these cases using
> > samefile() instead of st_ino _will_ result in a corrupted result.
>
> Also note, that using st_ino in combination with samefile() doesn't
> make the result much better, it eliminates false positives, but cannot
> fix false negatives.
I'd argue false negatives are not as severe.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists