[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45A1A378.9050008@garzik.org>
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 20:50:48 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
CC: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc3] sata_promise: ATAPI support
Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> This patch adds ATAPI support to the sata_promise driver.
> This has been tested on both first- and second-generation
> chips (20378 and 20575), and with both SATAPI and PATAPI
> devices. CD-writing works, and bulk data transfers use DMA.
>
> SATAPI works on second-generation chips, but not on
> first-generation chips due to HW limitations.
> PATAPI works on both first- and second-generation chips,
> but requires the PATA support patch as well (which needs
> an update due to a conflict in the board_2037x definition).
>
> The functional changes to the driver are:
> - remove ATA_FLAG_NO_ATAPI from PDC_COMMON_FLAGS, and add it
> back to the boards that cannot support SATAPI (20319, 2037x)
> - add ->check_atapi() operation to enable DMA for bulk data
> transfers but force PIO for other ATAPI commands; this filter
> is taken from Promise's driver and pata_pdc207x.c
> - add handling of ATAPI protocols to pdc_qc_prep(), pdc_host_intr(),
> and pdc_qc_issue_prot(): ATAPI_DMA is handled by the driver
> while non-DMA protocols are handed over to libata generic code
> - add pdc_issue_atapi_pkt_cmd() to handle the initial steps in
> issuing ATAPI DMA commands before sending the actual CDB;
> this procedure was ported from Promise's driver
>
> With this patch ATAPI will work on SATA ports on second-generation
> chips, and on the first-generation PATA-only 20619. ATAPI on the
> 2057x' PATA port will work automatically when #promise-sata-pata
> is updated. ATAPI on the 2037x' PATA port is enabled by a followup
> patch for the #promise-sata-pata branch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
No objections, minor revision requests follow.
* general comment: please combine the 'make first gen SATAPI work'
patch with this one.
> --- linux-2.6.20-rc3/drivers/ata/sata_promise.c.~1~ 2007-01-01 13:32:35.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.20-rc3/drivers/ata/sata_promise.c 2007-01-06 15:36:43.000000000 +0100
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <scsi/scsi.h>
> #include <scsi/scsi_host.h>
> #include <scsi/scsi_cmnd.h>
> #include <linux/libata.h>
> @@ -77,7 +78,7 @@ enum {
> PDC_RESET = (1 << 11), /* HDMA reset */
>
> PDC_COMMON_FLAGS = ATA_FLAG_NO_LEGACY |
> - ATA_FLAG_MMIO | ATA_FLAG_NO_ATAPI |
> + ATA_FLAG_MMIO |
> ATA_FLAG_PIO_POLLING,
>
> /* hp->flags bits */
> @@ -105,6 +106,7 @@ static void pdc_pata_phy_reset(struct at
> static void pdc_qc_prep(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc);
> static void pdc_tf_load_mmio(struct ata_port *ap, const struct ata_taskfile *tf);
> static void pdc_exec_command_mmio(struct ata_port *ap, const struct ata_taskfile *tf);
> +static int pdc_check_atapi_dma(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc);
> static void pdc_irq_clear(struct ata_port *ap);
> static unsigned int pdc_qc_issue_prot(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc);
> static void pdc_host_stop(struct ata_host *host);
> @@ -139,6 +141,7 @@ static const struct ata_port_operations
> .check_status = ata_check_status,
> .exec_command = pdc_exec_command_mmio,
> .dev_select = ata_std_dev_select,
> + .check_atapi_dma = pdc_check_atapi_dma,
>
> .qc_prep = pdc_qc_prep,
> .qc_issue = pdc_qc_issue_prot,
> @@ -164,6 +167,7 @@ static const struct ata_port_operations
> .check_status = ata_check_status,
> .exec_command = pdc_exec_command_mmio,
> .dev_select = ata_std_dev_select,
> + .check_atapi_dma = pdc_check_atapi_dma,
>
> .phy_reset = pdc_pata_phy_reset,
>
> @@ -183,7 +187,7 @@ static const struct ata_port_info pdc_po
> /* board_2037x */
> {
> .sht = &pdc_ata_sht,
> - .flags = PDC_COMMON_FLAGS | ATA_FLAG_SATA,
> + .flags = PDC_COMMON_FLAGS | ATA_FLAG_NO_ATAPI | ATA_FLAG_SATA,
> .pio_mask = 0x1f, /* pio0-4 */
> .mwdma_mask = 0x07, /* mwdma0-2 */
> .udma_mask = 0x7f, /* udma0-6 ; FIXME */
> @@ -193,7 +197,7 @@ static const struct ata_port_info pdc_po
> /* board_20319 */
> {
> .sht = &pdc_ata_sht,
> - .flags = PDC_COMMON_FLAGS | ATA_FLAG_SATA,
> + .flags = PDC_COMMON_FLAGS | ATA_FLAG_NO_ATAPI | ATA_FLAG_SATA,
> .pio_mask = 0x1f, /* pio0-4 */
> .mwdma_mask = 0x07, /* mwdma0-2 */
> .udma_mask = 0x7f, /* udma0-6 ; FIXME */
> @@ -391,6 +395,30 @@ static void pdc_sata_scr_write (struct a
> writel(val, (void __iomem *) ap->ioaddr.scr_addr + (sc_reg * 4));
> }
>
> +static void pdc_atapi_dma_pkt(struct ata_taskfile *tf,
> + dma_addr_t sg_table,
> + unsigned int cdb_len, u8 *cdb,
> + u8 *buf)
> +{
> + u32 *buf32 = (u32 *) buf;
> +
> + /* set control bits (byte 0), zero delay seq id (byte 3),
> + * and seq id (byte 2)
> + */
> + if (!(tf->flags & ATA_TFLAG_WRITE))
> + buf32[0] = cpu_to_le32(PDC_PKT_READ);
> + else
> + buf32[0] = 0;
> + buf32[1] = cpu_to_le32(sg_table); /* S/G table addr */
> + buf32[2] = 0; /* no next-packet */
> +
> + /* we can represent cdb lengths 2/4/6/8/10/12/14/16 */
> + BUG_ON(cdb_len & ~0x1E);
> +
> + buf[12] = (((cdb_len >> 1) & 7) << 5) | ATA_REG_DATA | PDC_LAST_REG;
> + memcpy(buf+13, cdb, cdb_len);
> +}
> +
> static void pdc_qc_prep(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
> {
> struct pdc_port_priv *pp = qc->ap->private_data;
> @@ -415,6 +443,16 @@ static void pdc_qc_prep(struct ata_queue
> pdc_pkt_footer(&qc->tf, pp->pkt, i);
> break;
>
> + case ATA_PROT_ATAPI:
> + case ATA_PROT_ATAPI_NODATA:
> + ata_qc_prep(qc);
> + break;
> +
> + case ATA_PROT_ATAPI_DMA:
> + ata_qc_prep(qc);
> + pdc_atapi_dma_pkt(&qc->tf, qc->ap->prd_dma, qc->dev->cdb_len, qc->cdb, pp->pkt);
> + break;
> +
> default:
> break;
> }
> @@ -528,6 +566,7 @@ static inline unsigned int pdc_host_intr
> switch (qc->tf.protocol) {
> case ATA_PROT_DMA:
> case ATA_PROT_NODATA:
> + case ATA_PROT_ATAPI_DMA:
> qc->err_mask |= ac_err_mask(ata_wait_idle(ap));
> ata_qc_complete(qc);
> handled = 1;
> @@ -624,18 +663,106 @@ static inline void pdc_packet_start(stru
> readl((void __iomem *) ap->ioaddr.cmd_addr + PDC_PKT_SUBMIT); /* flush */
> }
>
> +static unsigned int pdc_wait_for_drq(struct ata_port *ap)
> +{
> + void __iomem *port_mmio = (void __iomem *) ap->ioaddr.cmd_addr;
> + unsigned int i;
> + unsigned int status;
> +
> + /* Following pdc-ultra's WaitForDrq() we loop here until BSY
> + * is clear and DRQ is set in altstatus. We could possibly call
> + * ata_busy_wait() and loop until DRQ is set, but since we don't
> + * know how much time a call to ata_busy_wait() took, we don't
> + * know when to time out the outer loop.
> + */
> + for(i = 0; i < 1000; ++i) {
> + status = readb(port_mmio + 0x38); /* altstatus */
> + if (status == 0xFF)
> + break;
> + if (status & ATA_BUSY)
> + ;
> + else if (status & (ATA_DRQ | ATA_ERR))
> + break;
> + mdelay(1);
> + }
This really hurts to do this with spinlocks held. Long term, ponder
ways to move this to a kernel thread that can sleep [if it takes too long?]
> + if (i >= 1000)
> + ata_port_printk(ap, KERN_WARNING, "%s timed out", __FUNCTION__);
> + return status;
> +}
> +
> +static void pdc_issue_atapi_pkt_cmd(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
> +{
> + struct ata_port *ap = qc->ap;
> + void __iomem *port_mmio = (void __iomem *) ap->ioaddr.cmd_addr;
> + void __iomem *host_mmio = ap->host->mmio_base;
> + unsigned int nbytes;
> + unsigned int tmp;
> +
> + /* disable INTA here, it will be re-enable when CAM use SEQ 0 for packets */
cut-n-pasted comment? This is not CAM :)
> + writeb(0x00, port_mmio + PDC_CTLSTAT); /* that the drive INT pass to SEQ 0*/
> + writeb(0x20, host_mmio + 0); /* but mask SEQ 0 INT */
please create named constants for these magic numbers
> + /* select drive */
> + if (sata_scr_valid(ap)) {
> + tmp = 0xE0;
> + } else {
> + tmp = ATA_DEVICE_OBS;
> + if (qc->dev->devno != 0)
> + tmp |= ATA_DEV1;
> + }
> + writeb(tmp, port_mmio + 0x18); /* device/head */
> + ata_busy_wait(ap, ATA_BUSY, 1000);
> +
> + writeb(0x00, port_mmio + 0x08); /* sector count */
> + writeb(0x00, port_mmio + 0x0c); /* sector number */
> +
> + /* set feature register */
> + if (qc->tf.protocol != ATA_PROT_ATAPI_DMA) {
> + tmp = 0x00; /* data xfer by PIO ! */
> + /* set real transfer byte count to byte counter register (cylinder low/high) */
> + nbytes = qc->nbytes;
> + if (!nbytes)
> + nbytes = qc->nsect << 9;
> + if (nbytes > 0xffff)
> + nbytes = 0xffff;
> + } else {
> + tmp = 0x01; /* set DMA bit */
ditto
> + /* byte counter register (cylinder low/high) , set to 0 */
> + nbytes = 0;
> + }
> + writeb(tmp, port_mmio + 0x04); /* feature */
> + writeb(nbytes & 0xFF, port_mmio + 0x10); /* cylinder low */
> + writeb((nbytes >> 8) & 0xFF, port_mmio + 0x14); /* cylinder high */
> +
> + /* send ATAPI packet command 0xA0 */
> + writeb(ATA_CMD_PACKET, port_mmio + 0x1c); /* command/status */
ditto, for the port_mmio offsets as well
> + /*
> + * At this point in the issuing of a packet command, the Promise
> + * driver busy-waits for INT (CTLSTAT bit 27) if it detected
> + * (at port init time) that the device interrupts with assertion
> + * of DRQ after receiving a packet command.
> + *
> + * XXX: Do we need to handle this case as well? Does libata detect
> + * this case for us, or do we have to do our own per-port init?
> + */
> +
> + pdc_wait_for_drq(ap);
> +
> + /* now device wait CDB only */
> +}
> +
> static unsigned int pdc_qc_issue_prot(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
> {
> switch (qc->tf.protocol) {
> + case ATA_PROT_ATAPI_DMA:
> + pdc_issue_atapi_pkt_cmd(qc);
> + /*FALLTHROUGH*/
> case ATA_PROT_DMA:
> case ATA_PROT_NODATA:
> pdc_packet_start(qc);
> return 0;
>
> - case ATA_PROT_ATAPI_DMA:
> - BUG();
> - break;
> -
> default:
> break;
> }
> @@ -658,6 +785,32 @@ static void pdc_exec_command_mmio(struct
> ata_exec_command(ap, tf);
> }
>
> +static int pdc_check_atapi_dma(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
> +{
> + u8 *scsicmd = qc->scsicmd->cmnd;
> + int pio = 1; /* atapi dma off by default */
> +
> + /* Whitelist commands that may use DMA. */
> + switch (scsicmd[0]) {
> + case WRITE_12:
> + case WRITE_10:
> + case WRITE_6:
> + case READ_12:
> + case READ_10:
> + case READ_6:
> + case 0xad: /* READ_DVD_STRUCTURE */
> + case 0xbe: /* READ_CD */
> + pio = 0;
> + }
> + /* -45150 (FFFF4FA2) to -1 (FFFFFFFF) shall use PIO mode */
> + if (scsicmd[0] == WRITE_10) {
> + unsigned int lba;
> + lba = (scsicmd[2] << 24) | (scsicmd[3] << 16) | (scsicmd[4] << 8) | scsicmd[5];
> + if (lba >= 0xFFFF4FA2)
> + pio = 1;
> + }
> + return pio;
> +}
>
> static void pdc_ata_setup_port(struct ata_ioports *port, unsigned long base)
> {
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists