[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45A2688E.3080503@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 10:51:42 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
To: Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: akpm@...l.org, torvalds@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sata_via: PATA support, resubmit
Alan wrote:
>> The problem you need to fix or work around is ata_probe_ent, which
>> doesn't properly fill in ata_port info for this situation. Tejun has
>> posted patches that kill ata_probe_ent, which you were pointed to.
>
> And which are not yet in the main tree leaving many users unable to
> install Linux.
The controllers affected by your patch have been around for well over a
year. I doubt a huge amount of suffering will be caused by pausing to
get it right... especially when you have been pointed at two working
code examples that already get it right.
> This isn't the way to get stuff done. When you've got the
> new patches in the driver can use them if its worth it (which, see below,
> I question).
In Linux, we work /with/ the subsystem, not around it.
Your current approach is fundamentally flawed. You can see this because
e.g. a call to vt6421_ops::scr_read() will immediately oops, after your
patch.
Just separate PATA and SATA operations. That way everything works as
expected, and you don't unintentionally add lovely oopses all over the
place.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists