linux-kernel - Re: [announce] [patch] KVM paravirtualization for Linux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701081016140.9173@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date:	Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:18:34 -0800 (PST)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	kvm-devel <kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
Subject: Re: [announce] [patch] KVM paravirtualization for Linux

On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:

> Does this make Xen obsolete? I mean... we have xen patches in suse
> kernels, should we keep updating them, or just drop them in favour of
> KVM?
> 							Pavel

Xen is duplicating basic OS components like the scheduler etc. As 
a result its difficult to maintain and not well integrated with Linux. 
KVM looks like a better approach.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/