[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070108190942.GA23629@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:09:42 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, akpm@...l.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: haveblue@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: kobject.c changes in -mm
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 01:37:47PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> --- linux-2.6.20-rc3/lib/kobject.c 2007-01-01 23:04:49.000000000 -0800
> +++ devel/lib/kobject.c 2007-01-04 21:13:21.000000000 -0800
> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/stat.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/kallsyms.h>
> +#include <asm-generic/sections.h>
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> +static int ptr_in_range(void *ptr, void *start, void *end)
> +{
> + /*
> + * This should hopefully get rid of causing warnings
> + * if the architecture did not set one of the section
> + * variables up.
> + */
> + if (start >= end)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if ((ptr >= start) && (ptr < end))
> + return 1;
> + return 0;
> +}
>
>
> Can anyone explain WTF is going on here? Including asm-generic headers
> in core code definitly is not okay. As are random CONFIG_X86_32 ifdefs
> in said code.
It's a hack for debugging. See the full patch at:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/patches/driver/warn-when-statically-allocated-kobjects-are-used.patch
It is never going to go to mainline, due to the arch-specific hacks as
you have noted. But is good to have for debugging and getting error
reports from users of -mm.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists