linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/24] Unionfs: Documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:18:52 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To:	"Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <jsipek@...sunysb.edu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	hch@...radead.org, viro@....linux.org.uk, torvalds@...l.org,
	mhalcrow@...ibm.com, David Quigley <dquigley@....cs.sunysb.edu>,
	Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/24] Unionfs: Documentation

On Sun,  7 Jan 2007 23:12:53 -0500
"Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <jsipek@...sunysb.edu> wrote:

> +Modifying a Unionfs branch directly, while the union is mounted, is
> +currently unsupported.

Does this mean that if I have /a/b/ and /c/d/ unionised under /mnt/union, I
am not allowed to alter anything under /a/b/ and /c/d/?  That I may only
alter stuff under /mnt/union?

If so, that sounds like a significant limitation.

> Any such change can cause Unionfs to oops, or stay
> silent and even RESULT IN DATA LOSS.

With a rather rough user interface ;)

Also, is it possible to add new branches to an existing union mount?  And
to take old ones away?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/