linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] All Transmeta CPUs have constant TSCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:51:31 -0600
From:	"Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
CC:	dean gaudet <dean@...tic.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] All Transmeta CPUs have constant TSCs

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Jan 8 2007 00:02, dean gaudet wrote:

>>transmeta decided years before intel and amd that a constant rate tsc 
>>(unaffected by P-state) was the only sane choice.  on transmeta cpus the 
>>tsc increments at the maximum cpu frequency no matter what the P-state 
>>(and no matter what longrun is doing behind the kernel's back).

> Well it defeats the purpose of TSC. I mean, they could have kept the "TSC" and
> instead added a second TSC ticker, constant_tsc.

Given that the name is "time stamp counter" then it makes sense to me to 
have a constant frequency.

For performance monitoring it would be useful to have a "cpu cycle 
counter" that counts clock cycles, and varies (and possibly stops) with 
the cpu itself.

Chris



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/