linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86_64 ioapic: Improve the heuristics for when check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m1lkkdgq4k.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date:	Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:33:47 -0700
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	"Lu, Yinghai" <yinghai.lu@....com>
Cc:	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...l.org>,
	"Tobias Diedrich" <ranma+kernel@...edrich.de>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org>, "Adrian Bunk" <bunk@...sta.de>,
	"Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86_64 ioapic: Improve the heuristics for when check_timer fails.

"Lu, Yinghai" <yinghai.lu@....com> writes:

>>So that doesn't invalidate the generic test.  I'm going to go dig
>>out what little information I have and see if I can stair at the
>>register definition.
>
> Someone said we can that info about that reg in Kernel. And only
> firmware can use that.

We can do all kinds of things when firmware gets it wrong, and in this
case I just want a deeper understanding.  Once I understand that mess
I will decide what to do about it.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/