[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070108232131.GA25007@stusta.de>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 00:21:31 +0100
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc: discuss@...-64.org, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@....com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
Tobias Diedrich <ranma+kernel@...edrich.de>
Subject: Re: [discuss] [PATCH 4/4] x86_64 ioapic: Improve the heuristics for when check_timer fails.
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 12:14:41AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > We just got a completely different bug reported that was confirmed to be
> > caused by Andi's patch:
> > AMD64/ATI : timer is running twice as fast as it should [1]
>
> I have such a machine that showed this problem and when I wrote the patch I
> tested it on it (and on a couple of others of course). No twice as fast on
> my testing.
>
> In fact there are two types of ATI machines: ones that have a BIOS workaround
> for the original Linux issue and ones that don't. Keeping both
> happy is not easy.
>
> So I'm somewhat dubious on that. Where is that report?
Follow the link [1] in my email (and the bug is already assigned to
you).
> > My whole point is that for 2.6.20, we can live with simply reverting
> > Andi's commit.
>
> I agree. It's more problematical than I expected. Reverting is
> the best option right now.
>
> -Andi
cu
Adrian
[1] http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7789
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists