| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: 08 Jan 2007 07:38:18 +0100 From: Peter Osterlund <petero2@...ia.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: torvalds@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kaber@...sh.net Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc4 David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes: > From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org> > Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:50:15 -0800 (PST) > > > David, there really *is* something screwy in netfilter. > > Sure, but from what I can see this bug appears unrelated to the one in > kernel bugzilla #7781 that we've been discussing the past few days. > > First of all, the nf conntrack paths won't be used by normal > users until 2.6.20-rc1 or so. The bz #7781 report is against > 2.6.19 and all those backtraces have IP conntrack in them, not > nf conntrack. > > So what are we compiling with here btw, gcc-4.1? "gcc version 4.1.1 20060525 (Red Hat 4.1.1-1)" from Fedora Core 5. That distribution has gcc32 installed too, so I'll try that compiler too and report back. -- Peter Osterlund - petero2@...ia.com http://web.telia.com/~u89404340 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists