linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070107.170056.76564352.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sun, 07 Jan 2007 17:00:56 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	torvalds@...l.org
Cc:	petero2@...ia.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc4

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:50:15 -0800 (PST)

> David, there really *is* something screwy in netfilter. 

Sure, but from what I can see this bug appears unrelated to the one in
kernel bugzilla #7781 that we've been discussing the past few days.

First of all, the nf conntrack paths won't be used by normal
users until 2.6.20-rc1 or so.  The bz #7781 report is against
2.6.19 and all those backtraces have IP conntrack in them, not
nf conntrack.

So what are we compiling with here btw, gcc-4.1?

I want to rule the compiler out in this and the bz #7781 case
so that we can look at the code seriously.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/