[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020701080000v460a9f3aja9570e72fa457934@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:00:41 +0200
From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: "Hua Zhong" <hzhong@...il.com>
Cc: "Amit Choudhary" <amit2030@...oo.com>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org>,
"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] include/linux/slab.h: new KFREE() macro.
On 1/8/07, Hua Zhong <hzhong@...il.com> wrote:
> > And as I explained, it can result in longer code too. So, why
> > keep this value around. Why not re-initialize it to NULL.
>
> Because initialization increases code size.
And it also effectively blocks the slab debugging code from doing its
job detecting double-frees.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists