| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <810563.91187.qm@web55604.mail.re4.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 00:31:44 -0800 (PST) From: Amit Choudhary <amit2030@...oo.com> To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, Hua Zhong <hzhong@...il.com> Cc: Amit Choudhary <amit2030@...oo.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] include/linux/slab.h: new KFREE() macro. --- Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote: > On 1/8/07, Hua Zhong <hzhong@...il.com> wrote: > > > And as I explained, it can result in longer code too. So, why > > > keep this value around. Why not re-initialize it to NULL. > > > > Because initialization increases code size. > > And it also effectively blocks the slab debugging code from doing its > job detecting double-frees. > Man, so you do want someone to set 'x' to NULL after freeing it, so that the slab debugging code can catch double frees. If you set it to NULL then double free is harmless. So, you want something harmful in the system and then debug it with the slab debugging code. Man, doesn't make sense to me. -Amit __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists