[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45A36A9E.8030408@garzik.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 05:12:46 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
CC: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 1/2] sata_promise: TX2plus PATA support
Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> This patch implements a simple way of setting up per-port
> flags on the SATA+PATA Promise TX2plus chips, which is a
> prerequisite for supporting the PATA port on those chips.
>
> It is based on the observation that ap->flags isn't really
> used until after ->port_start() has been invoked. So it
> places the "exceptional" per-port flags array in the driver's
> private host structure, and uses it in ->port_start() to
> finalise the port's flags.
>
> This patch obsoletes the #promise-sata-pata branch included
> in the #all branch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
applied patches 1-2 to #upstream. minor follow-up comments follow in
separate emails.
Thanks a bunch for working on this, sata_promise has needed some "love"
for quite a while.
Any chance you could be talked to becoming "official" sata_promise
maintainer, by sending in a patch to MAINTAINERS?
One open issue that remains is port enumeration order. Bug reports
consistently indicate that the ports are numbered on the board (visible
to the naked eye) in a different manner than how the chip enumerates
each port. According to the bug reports, Promise's driver enumerates
the ports in the correct order.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists