linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/10] cxgb3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1168354013.4628.14.camel@stevo-desktop>
Date:	Tue, 09 Jan 2007 08:46:53 -0600
From:	Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...lanox.co.il>
Cc:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	openib-general <openib-general@...nib.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Divy Le Ray <divy@...lsio.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/10] cxgb3 - main header files

On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 15:57 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > We also need to decide on the ib_req_notify_cq() issue.  
> 
> Let's clarify - do you oppose doing copy_from_user from a fixed
> address passed in during setup?
> 

So far its been you and I arguing over this issue.  Before I go
implement it and retest everything, I'd like some indication that anyone
else thinks its the right thing to do vs adding the extra parameter to
ib_req_notify_cq().

> If OK with you, this seems the best way as it is the least controversial
> and least disruptive one.
> 

In the interest of expediting this I'll go implement it...

Steve.




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/