[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070109150755.GB89@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:07:55 +0300
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: vatsa@...ibm.com, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Gautham shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] flush_cpu_workqueue: don't flush an empty ->worklist
On 01/08, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> That's not correct. freeze_processes() will freeze *all* processes. All
> of them are forced to enter refrigerator(). With the mysterious exception
> of some I/O-related kernel threads, which might need some thought.
Yes, and we can remove a dead CPU safely, this part is ok.
> > and
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=116817460726058.
>
> Am not sure how that's related.
but at some point we should thaw processes, including cwq->thread which
should die. So we are doing things like take_over_work() and this is the
source of races, because the dead CPU is not on cpu_online_map.
flush_workqueue() doesn't use any locks now. If we use freezer to implement
cpu-hotplug nothing will change, we still have races.
It looks so obvious to me, so I'm starting to suspect I missed something
very simple :(
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists