lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:11:23 -0500 From: Shaya Potter <spotter@...columbia.edu> To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Josef Sipek <jsipek@....cs.sunysb.edu>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org, viro@....linux.org.uk, torvalds@...l.org, mhalcrow@...ibm.com, David Quigley <dquigley@....cs.sunysb.edu>, Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu> Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/24] Unionfs: Documentation On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 12:03 -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote: > I'm saying that at the very least it should not Oops in these > situations. As to whether or not they are something you want to handle > more gracefully, that is up to you, but Oopses are definitely a > showstopper. I don't think anyone involved disagrees. Any oops is a bug that has to be fixed. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists