linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 1/4] futex priority based wakeup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:59:57 -0800
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To:	Pierre Peiffer <pierre.peiffer@...l.net>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@...ibm.com>,
	Jean-Pierre Dion <jean-pierre.dion@...l.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
	Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>,
	Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>,
	Sébastien Dugué <sebastien.dugue@...l.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 1/4] futex priority based wakeup

On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 17:16 +0100, Pierre Peiffer wrote:
> @@ -133,8 +133,8 @@ struct futex_q {
>    * Split the global futex_lock into every hash list lock.
>    */
>   struct futex_hash_bucket {
> -       spinlock_t              lock;
> -       struct list_head       chain;
> +	spinlock_t              lock;
> +	struct plist_head       chain;

Should have tabs between spinlock_t and lock , and plist_head and
chain.. It looks like the original didn't, but as long as your cleaning
up may as well get add them.

Daniel



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/