| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <45A3E380.2050709@intel.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:48:32 -0800 From: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com> To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH -MM] e1000: rewrite hardware initialization code Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:36:29 -0800 > Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com> wrote: > >> Andrew, All, >> >> This patch contains a major rewrite to the e1000 driver that groups and separates e1000 >> hardware by chipset family. It abstracts the hardware specific code into an API that >> will allow us to continue to maintain the complex e1000 driver and add new hardware >> support to it without touching code that affects older chipsets. > > Thats good. but: > >> drivers/net/e1000/Makefile | 19 >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h | 95 >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_80003es2lan.c | 1330 +++++ >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_80003es2lan.h | 89 >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82540.c | 586 ++ >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82541.c | 1164 ++++ >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82541.h | 86 >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82542.c | 466 ++ >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82543.c | 1397 +++++ >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82543.h | 45 >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82571.c | 1132 ++++ >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82571.h | 42 >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_api.c | 1077 ++++ >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_api.h | 159 + >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_defines.h | 1289 +++++ >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c | 470 +- >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_hw.c | 9038 --------------------------------- >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_hw.h | 3859 ++------------ >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ich8lan.c | 2353 +++++++++ >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ich8lan.h | 108 >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_mac.c | 1921 +++++++ >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_mac.h | 84 >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c | 1002 ++-- >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_manage.c | 387 + >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_manage.h | 83 >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_nvm.c | 860 +++ >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_nvm.h | 61 >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_osdep.h | 56 >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_param.c | 115 >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_phy.c | 1932 +++++++ >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_phy.h | 157 + >> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_regs.h | 236 + >> 32 files changed, 18538 insertions(+), 13160 deletions(-) > > Is lots of little files really progress? > I can think of a few files that we could merge myself, but we really wanted to get away from the two large (e1000_hw) files that we had, which was far worse. We're open to suggestions as to reduce the amount of files, but since e1000 has it's own subdirectory, and supports a large amount of files, I think we're in the right direction with the amount. We approached it this from a rather superfluous amount of files standpoint knowing we can merge some later anyway. One thing we've contemplated ourselves was to merge the smaller .h files into the .c files where applicable, so your comment goes duly noted Thanks, Auke - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists