[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0701092301170.4779@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:02:38 +0100 (MET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: Shaya Potter <spotter@...columbia.edu>
cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Josef Sipek <jsipek@....cs.sunysb.edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org,
viro@....linux.org.uk, torvalds@...l.org, mhalcrow@...ibm.com,
David Quigley <dquigley@....cs.sunysb.edu>,
Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/24] Unionfs: Documentation
On Jan 9 2007 11:41, Shaya Potter wrote:
>
>Again, what about fibre channel support? Imagine I have multiple blades
>connected to a SAN. For whatever reason I format the san w/ ext3 (I've
>actually done this when we didn't need sharing, just needed a huge disk,
>for instance for doing benchmarks where I needed a large data set that
>was bigger than the 40GB disk that the blades came with). I better not
>touch that disk from any of the other blades.
Except probably for the shared partition table, there should not be a
problem if you mount sda1 on one blade, sda2 on another, etc. Or use
something like GFS2 if you want sharing ;-)
-`J'
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists