[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070110180549.ec871845.khali@linux-fr.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:05:49 +0100
From: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...igh.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@...l.ru>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>,
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>,
Olaf Hering <olaf@...fle.de>
Subject: Re: .version keeps being updated
Hi Martin,
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:52:24 -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I use it pretty commonly to answer the question "did I remember to install
> > that new kernel I just built before I rebooted"? By comparing `uname -a'
> > with $TOPDIR/.version.
>
> Yup, we need to do the same thing in automated testing. Especially when
> you're doing lilo -R, and don't know if you ended up fscking or panicing
> during attempted reboot to new kernel.
>
> Better would be a checksum of the vmlinux vs the running kernel text,
> but that seems to be impossible due to code rewriting. Could we embed
> a checksum in a little /proc file for this?
What would this allow that our current autoincrementing counter doesn't?
--
Jean Delvare
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists