lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:05:49 +0100
From:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To:	"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...igh.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@...l.ru>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>,
	Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>,
	Olaf Hering <olaf@...fle.de>
Subject: Re: .version keeps being updated

Hi Martin,

On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:52:24 -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I use it pretty commonly to answer the question "did I remember to install
> > that new kernel I just built before I rebooted"?  By comparing `uname -a'
> > with $TOPDIR/.version.
> 
> Yup, we need to do the same thing in automated testing. Especially when
> you're doing lilo -R, and don't know if you ended up fscking or panicing
> during attempted reboot to new kernel.
> 
> Better would be a checksum of the vmlinux vs the running kernel text,
> but that seems to be impossible due to code rewriting. Could we embed
> a checksum in a little /proc file for this?

What would this allow that our current autoincrementing counter doesn't?

-- 
Jean Delvare
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ