[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070110015739.GA26978@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:57:39 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...il.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, git@...r.kernel.org,
nigel@...el.suspend2.net, "J.H." <warthog9@...nel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
webmaster@...nel.org,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: How git affects kernel.org performance
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 08:23:32AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > >
> > > The fastest and probably most important thing to add is some readahead
> > > smarts to directories --- both to the htree and non-htree cases. If
> >
> > Here's is a quick hack to practice the directory readahead idea.
> > Comments are welcome, it's a freshman's work :)
>
> Well, I'd probably have done it differently, but more important is whether
> this actually makes a difference performance-wise. Have you benchmarked it
> at all?
Yes, a trivial test shows a marginal improvement, on a minimal debian system:
# find / | wc -l
13641
# time find / > /dev/null
real 0m10.000s
user 0m0.210s
sys 0m4.370s
# time find / > /dev/null
real 0m9.890s
user 0m0.160s
sys 0m3.270s
> Doing an
>
> echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
>
> is your friend for testing things like this, to force cold-cache
> behaviour..
Thanks, I'll work out numbers on large/concurrent dir accesses soon.
Regards,
Wu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists