linux-kernel - Re: page_mapcount(page) went negative

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45A57C69.6090305@yahoo.com.au>
Date:	Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:53:13 +1100
From:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
Subject: Re: page_mapcount(page) went negative

Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 04:20:37PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:

>  > IMO the pattern is much too consistent to be able to attribute
>  > them all to hardware problems. And considering it takes so long
>  > for these things to appear, can we get something like the attached
>  > patch upstream at least until we manage to stamp them out? Any
>  > other debugging info we can add?
> 
> I finally got another trace out of a 2.6.19.1 with this debug patch..
> I'm starting to wonder if this is hardware related.
> That box makes me suspicious as its motherboard has a bunch
> of bulging capacitors on it. I had three of these, the previous
> two died like so: http://www.flickr.com/photos/kernelslacker/251807263/in/set-72157594298237090/
> This board hasn't started 'oozing' yet, but I think it may be on
> the cards.
> 
> iirc, the previous oopses were around the same time of morning,
> whilst cron.daily was hammering the hell out of the disk.
> Either there's a subtle bug, or this board just can't take the pressure.

The reason why I'm inclined to think there might be a kernel bug is that this
bug seems to trigger a disproportionately high number of times if you consider
the frequency of reports vs frequency of reports of bad page state or bad
pte bugs, for example.

> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel:   page->flags = 414

referenced|dirty|reserved

> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel:   page->count = 1
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel:   page->mapping = 00000000

OK, so it is !PageAnon. Seems like the file was truncated?! Then it shouldn't
be mapped at all? OTOH the truncate could easily have skipped such a page:
truncate doesn't rely on mapcount like invalidate.

Hmm, it could be invalidated or vmtruncate_range()d, if you've hit the nopage
vs invalidate race. But would that cause the mapcount to skew? I don't see
how...

> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel:   vma->vm_ops->nopage = filemap_nopage+0x0/0x33e

filemap_nopage. Then PG_reserved should not be getting set, AFAIKS.

Might pte corruption have caused us to get completely the wrong page here?



> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel: kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:581!
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1]
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel: SMP 
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel: last sysfs file: /class/net/lo/type
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel: Modules linked in: tun ipt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat ip_nat ipt_LOG xt_limit ipv6 ip_conntrack_netbios_ns ipt_REJECT xt_state i
> p_conntrack nfnetlink xt_tcpudp iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables video sbs i2c_ec button battery asus_acpi ac parport_pc lp parport sr_mod sg pcspkr i2c_via
> pro ide_cd i2c_core 3c59x via_rhine cdrom mii via_ircc irda crc_ccitt serio_raw dm_snapshot dm_zero dm_mirror dm_mod ext3 jbd ehci_hcd ohci_hcd uhci_hcd
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel: CPU:    0
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel: EIP:    0060:[<c046d995>]    Not tainted VLI
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel: EFLAGS: 00010286   (2.6.19-1.2886.fc6debug #1)
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel: EIP is at page_remove_rmap+0x8b/0xac
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel: eax: 00000034   ebx: c1000000   ecx: c042818c   edx: da0b3550
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel: esi: daecd0c0   edi: 00000020   ebp: cd386140   esp: ce2f4dc4
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel: ds: 007b   es: 007b   ss: 0068
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel: Process zcat (pid: 22721, ti=ce2f4000 task=da0b3550 task.ti=ce2f4000)
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel: Stack: c066b7b6 00000000 c1000000 08050000 c0467c63 c06c7f10 00000046 00000000 
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel:        daecd0c0 ce2f4e44 003f7ffd 00000000 00000001 08055000 cf354080 dde93520 
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel:        c1401e80 00000000 fffffff9 dde9358c cf354080 08055000 00000000 ce2f4e44 
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel: Call Trace:
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel:  [<c0467c63>] unmap_vmas+0x2a6/0x536
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel:  [<c046aaa8>] exit_mmap+0x77/0x105
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel:  [<c0425471>] mmput+0x37/0x80
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel:  [<c042a4b5>] do_exit+0x21c/0x7a3
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel:  [<c042aac9>] sys_exit_group+0x0/0xd
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel:  [<c043383d>] get_signal_to_deliver+0x38b/0x3b3
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel:  [<c0403677>] do_notify_resume+0x83/0x6c6
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel:  [<c0404159>] work_notifysig+0x13/0x1a
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel:  [<0804a84e>] 0x804a84e
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel:  =======================
> Jan  7 04:24:35 firewall kernel: Code: 4c a4 fb ff 8b 43 10 c7 04 24 b6 b7 66 c0 89 44 24 04 e8 39 a4 fb ff 8b 46 40 85 c0 74 0d 8b 50 08 b8 cf b7 66 c0 e8 d
> 8 a9 fd ff <0f> 0b 45 02 4b b7 66 c0 8b 53 10 89 d8 59 5b 5b 5e 83 f2 01 83 


-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/