[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070111114034.GA6333@twibble.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:40:35 +1100
From: Jamie Lenehan <lenehan@...bble.org>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc3] rtc-sh correctly reports rtc_wkalrm.enabled
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 08:55:05PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
[...]
> An audit of the RTC driver treatment of the "enabled" flag turned
> up a handful of clear bugs; most drivers handle it the same now
Yeah, I missed the existing of the enabled flag when I added alarm
support to the driver. Your patch is fine.
> This driver has another issue: sh_rtc_set_alarm() ignores the
> "enabled" flag, rather than using it to tell whether the alarm
> should be enabled on exit from that routine. One at a time. :)
I'll can take care of this.
--
Jamie Lenehan <lenehan@...bble.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists