[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070111124521.GN13675@harddisk-recovery.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:45:21 +0100
From: Erik Mouw <erik@...ddisk-recovery.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Cc: Aubrey <aubreylee@...il.com>, Hua Zhong <hzhong@...il.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hch@...radead.org, kenneth.w.chen@...el.com, akpm@...l.org,
mjt@....msk.ru
Subject: Re: O_DIRECT question
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 07:05:30PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I should have fought back harder. There really is no valid reason for EVER
> using O_DIRECT. You need a buffer whatever IO you do, and it might as well
> be the page cache. There are better ways to control the page cache than
> play games and think that a page cache isn't necessary.
There is a valid reason: you really don't want to go through the page
cache when a hard drive has bad blocks. The only way to get fast
recovery and correct error reporting to userspace is by using O_DIRECT.
> So don't use O_DIRECT. Use things like madvise() and posix_fadvise()
> instead.
Both don't do what I want it to do: only read the sector I request you
to read and certainly do not try to outsmart me by doing some kind of
readahead.
Erik
--
+-- Erik Mouw -- www.harddisk-recovery.com -- +31 70 370 12 90 --
| Lab address: Delftechpark 26, 2628 XH, Delft, The Netherlands
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists