[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070111.120151.71083168.k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:01:51 -0500 (EST)
From: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@...jp.nec.com>
To: jens.axboe@...cle.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, j-nomura@...jp.nec.com, k-ueda@...jp.nec.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] blk_end_request: caller change
Hi Jens,
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:34:31 +0100, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
> > +static int cdrom_newpc_intr_dma_callback(void *arg)
> > +{
> > + void **argv = (void **)arg;
> > + struct request *rq = (struct request *)*argv++;
> > + ide_drive_t *drive = (ide_drive_t *)argv++;
> > + spinlock_t *ide_lock = (spinlock_t *)argv;
> > +
> > + rq->data_len = 0;
> > +
> > + cdrom_newpc_intr_callback_common(rq, drive, ide_lock);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> And this is why, down right horrible. The callback should be correctly
> typed, pass down a request pointer ALWAYS.
OK. I think everything such callbacks need can be obtained through
struct request. (e.g. ide_drive_t can get by rq->q->queuedata and
ide_lock can get by rq->q->queue_lock.)
So I'll change the callback to pass a pointer to the request
instead of void *.
Thanks,
Kiyoshi Ueda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists